The Worst of Sport: Punishment, Responsibility, and Penn State

What moral sense can we make of the sanctions that the NCAA levied against Penn State? Some argue that the sanctions are unfair because those directly responsible for failing to protect Sandusky’s victims are no longer at Penn State.  Others counter that the NCAA should have imposed the death penalty for Penn State’s egregious lack of institutional control.  Whatever your view, the sanctions clearly have a symbolic function; they express our shared moral outrage.  NCAA President Mark Emmert noted that the goal of the sanctions was not merely punitive but “to make sure that the University will establish an athletic culture and a daily mindset in which football will never again be placed ahead of educating, nurturing and protecting young people.” 

More than sanctions levied at a single university are needed for the kind of transformation that Emmert envisions.   Recall that up until last November, many regarded Joe Paterno as an icon of integrity in college football, who exemplified the virtues most revered in sports, such as hard-work, excellence, and above all, loyalty.  Senior officials at Penn State from the President to the Athletic Director also embodied those same virtues.  How then could men, recognized for their character, show what Judge Louis Freeh called in his scathing investigation of the Penn State scandal a “total disregard for the safety and welfare of Sandusky’s child victims?”

The Freeh report, while unsparing in its criticism of the individuals involved, revealed the true source of the problem -- a culture focused on winning and maintaining the appearance of institutional virtue but blind to those without power or influence, especially the most vulnerable among us—our children.  Although Emmert called the Penn State situation “anomalous in many respects,” the culture that led to and sustained the cover up is not unique to Penn State or to college athletics.   We have seen this culture thrive in the most revered of our social institutions throughout our country. 

Rather than simply focus on one institution that failed, we need to address a national culture that absolves us of responsibility for other people’s children.  We might start by making sure that all colleges that run sports camps and all youth sport organizations implement the Freeh report’s recommendations for mandatory abuse awareness and reporting programs.  However, we should not stop with policies and procedures that are designed simply to protect children from predator coaches. Creating a culture that nurtures and educates as well as protects demands a comprehensive child-centered approach to athletic programs for children at all ages.   The tragedy that has befallen Penn State is tragedy for all of us and a tragedy we must all address. 

Dr. Clark Power is a developmental psychologist and a professor at the University of Notre Dame. Power's expertise is in moral development of children, and has devoted much of his career to the service of children through the PLACT program, which he founded. Dr. Power will be commenting in a series of Blogs on the effects of the Jerry Sandusky scandal at Penn State University.